Access Keys
Contacts
  Location: Home | Projects | Wastewater Upgrade

MDC (Resources: Sewerage)

Urban Wastewater

Expressions of Interest

Use of Treated Effluent for Irrigation Purposes or in Leasing Section of Land for Effluent Treated Irrigation
 

The Masterton District Council is seeking Expressions of Interest from landholders interested in being supplied with treated effluent,or in leasing a 107 ha section of land to be irrigated with treated effluent.  Treated effluent for irrigation purposes is anticipated to be available in July 2011. 

We seek expressions of interest by Friday 26th June 2009. 

Discussions will be held with each of the parties submitting an expression of interest to determine their specific requirement, and to advise on the terms and conditions of supply.

Expressions of Interest


Urban Wastewater Hearings

Monday 30 March was the last day for independent commissioners to hear submissions on the Masterton Urban Wastewater Treatment Upgrade. 

Wes ten Hove Chief Executive Officer of Masterton District Council says it has been a good opportunity for people to raise their concerns about the project.   

“It was useful for the Council and I am confident that we have been able to address those concerns with the commissioners.’ 

The commissioners are expected to release their decision in early May. 

Wes ten Hove says the Council is looking forward to having certainty about the conditions of the consent and to know when the consent will be reviewed. 

Both these factors will impact on the cost of the project and will assist us to complete our 2009-19 Long-Term Council Community Plan.” 

“I hope that the objectors will be satisfied with the independent decision of the commissioners when it is released.  We are looking forward to starting the project next year as the upgrade will reduce discharges into the Ruamahunga River and stop any risks of adverse effects on the river.”


Wastewater Hearings to Reconvene on March 30, 2009

The hearing of the Masterton Wastewater Treatment Plant Upgrade was adjourned last Thursday and will reconvene on 30 March for the Council’s formal reply to issues raised during the hearing.  

The Council’s chief executive Wes ten Hove said that the Council will be submitting further evidence to respond to a range of matters raise by submitters. 

Mr ten Hove said he had a discussion with the Medical Officer of Health Dr Stephen Palmer to clarify the “somewhat alarming and incorrect” impression that the Ruamahanga River at the Cliffs would still remain unsafe for swimming after the upgrade.   

Mr ten Hove said: - “It is my clear understanding from subsequent discussions with Dr Palmer, that the Council will be able to present evidence to the Commissioners later this month, which will correct any such impression”.   

“In short, in summer, when most people are swimming in the river or having other contact recreation, there will be no discharge to the river” Mr ten Hove said. 

“While this matter is still before the Commission, I considered that the public needed reassurance as to the Council’s intent.  In my discussion with Dr Palmer it was clear and pleasing for both parties to note there is in fact a high degree of concurrence on most issues”    

The intervening period before the 30 March resumption was welcomed by Dr Palmer and the Council as providing the opportunity to get these matters correct, Mr ten Hove said. 

“It appeared the position was in fact very simple, but was getting lost in technical jargon.   Under the proposed scheme the discharge will not be occurring at low to average flows between 1 November and 30 April.  

“These are the flows when most swimming and other contact recreation occurs. Currently at these flows there is a low to moderate health risk as a result of the discharge. In the future, there will be a very low health risk because the discharge will not be occurring.  

“The message the Council wants to get across, and that the Medical Officer of Health agrees with, is that at the Cliffs, the recreation grading (SRG) will improve from “Very Poor” to “Fair” after the upgrade (ie two steps).   Dr Palmer has explained to me that this grading means the site will be safe for swimming, no signage will be required and normal water quality monitoring will continue.” 

Mr ten Hove said he discussed the general river conditions with Dr Palmer.  It was clearly understood that grading at the Cliffs would not improve beyond “Fair” even if there was never a  Masterton discharge.  This was because of all the other possible pollution sources, particularly rural run-off and stormwater risks. 

Mr ten Hove said he was sure that the local and health authorities in Wairarapa would be keen to follow up Dr Palmer’s observations on a more co-operative approach to the management of the water quality and any associated health risks, upstream and down stream of Masterton, and in fact all the way to Lake Onoke.
 


Council’s Evidence for Wastewater Upgrade Released – Monday February 16, 2009


Masterton District Council’s proposal to develop a longterm sustainable solution for the treatment of its wastewater will be discussed at Hearings set down for 11 days from February 24. 

The Council’s Evidence and other related information is online now, together with Greater Wellington’s report.

Our latest Wastewater Upgrade newsletter is also online. 

The Council received 34 submissions on its applications for Resource Consent and Notice of Requirement. 

These submissions, along with the Council’s evidence for the wastewater upgrade, will be considered by a panel of three Commissioners.  

These hearings are open to the public, however only submitters and witnesses will be able to address the hearing panel. 

The decision will be announced after a period of deliberation, probably in early May.
 


Electronic copies of Notice of Requirement, Assessment of Effects on the Environment & Appendices can be downloaded from the Greater Wellington website -

Notice of Requirement, Assessment of Effects on the Environment - 2.4MB .pdf file

Appendices - 24MB .pdf file


Masterton Wastewater Treatment Plant Upgrade Hearing

Index of Evidence to be called by applicant
 

 

Witness

Topic

Appendices

1.

David Hopman

Overview/background/upgrade
improvements

Beca Report:  Review of Pond Irrigation Area options Incorporating Additional Land
2.

Wes ten Hove

Funding and affordability

 
3. Humphrey Archer

Scheme design/engineering

Attachment A - Proposed Homebush Effluent Disposal Site: Soil Drainage Classes


Attachment B - Proposed Effluent Disposal Site: 107 ha property: Soil Drainage Classes

Attachment C - Proposed Effluent Disposal Site: 107 ha property: Soil Series

Attachment D - Sections of Makoura Stream and Drains

Attachment E - Draft Operations and Management Plan

Attachment F - Draft Construction and Management Plan

Attachment H - Draft Gravel Borrow Area Management Plan

Masterton Land Treatment of Wastewater

Land Treatment Design Manual by USEPA

Supplementary Statement of Evidence

Second Supplementary Statement of Evidence

4. Malcolm Franklin Infiltration and inflow rates  
5. Gary Williams Flooding and erosion  
6. Steve Green Land treatment capacity and water balance
 
Attachments A-D as per H Archer evidence - see above
 

Drawing C624: Proposed and Potential Land Treatment Area Layout and Area Schedule

Supplementary Statement of Evidence

7. Neal Borrie Effluent irrigation Appendix A - Landcare Research Ltd's Report on Leeston Land Treatment Site

Supplementary Statement of Evidence
8. Graeme Proffitt Groundwater quality and quantity Supplementary Statement of Evidence
9. Chris Hickey River water quality Supplementary Statement of Evidence
10. Jim Cooke Hydrology and general water quality Supplementary Statement of Evidence
11. Greg Ryder Environmental effects peer review Supplementary Statement of Evidence
12. Andrew Ball Public Health Supplementary Statement of Evidence
13. John Harding Wastewater engineering peer review Supplementary Statement of Evidence
14. Robert Schofield Resource management planning, policy analysis Supplementary Statement of Evidence


Plans referred to in the evidence but not included in the AEE

Section 42A Planning Report - Susan Southey, District Planner, Masterton District Council
 

Further Evidence

C Hickey, J Cooke & G Ryder Joint Statement in Response to GW Officers' Reply

N Borrie Response to Submitters

M Franklin Response to Submitters

S Green Response to Submitters

C Hickey Response to GW Officers' Report & Submitters

R Schofield Response to Submitters

S Palmer & A Ball Joint Statement

G Proffitt Response to GW Supplementary Evidence & Revised Consent Conditions

G Proffit Response to Submitters

G Ryder Response to GW Officers' Reply & Public Health Submission

W ten Hove Response to GW Officers & Submitters

H Archer Response to GW Officers' Reply & Submitters & Comments on Conditions

NZ1-1545616 Report - Review of Pathogen Reduction Waste Stabilisation Ponds 18.3.09 1

Attachment K - Flood Events & Recovery Period After the Floods

Attachment L Part 1 - Effluent Dilution in River Statistics

Attachment L Part 2 - Pond Discharge to River Patterns

Attachment M - Pond Storage with Varying Trigger & Dilution

Attachment N - Effluent Quality Compliance Limits

Attachment O - Documents Relating to HIA Preparation

Conditions 27-03-09

Closing Submissions


Proposed Masterton Wastewater Upgrade Project - Have your say

Notice of Requirement, Resource Consent Applications and Assessment of Effects on the Environment
The Notice of Requirement and Resource Consent Applications for the proposed urban waster upgrade project have been lodged with Greater Wellington Regional Council and Masterton District Council as required by the Resource Management Act 1991. Details of the proposed upgrade scheme, including the Notice of Requirement, Resource Consent Applications and an Assessment of Effects on the Environment can be downloaded from: Notice of Requirement and Applications for Resource Consent – August 2008  (PDF - 2.92Mb)


Any person may make a submission in support or in opposition on the proposed upgrade. Submission form  
 

Electronic copies of supporting information (e.g. appendices and background technical reports) can be downloaded from Greater Wellington’s webpage: http://www.gw.govt.nz/story28942.cfm. Alternatively, we can provide you with a CD, free of charge, call us on (06) 3706300 to request a disk. 
 

In addition, a hard copy of this information is available for reading at:

  • Masterton District Council, 64 Chapel Street, Masterton
  • Masterton Public Library, 50 Queen Street, Masterton
  • Greater Wellington Regional Council, Masterton office, 34 Chapel Street, Masterton

 

Informative Posters

A series of informative posters have been prepared to help summarise the proposed scheme design and its effects on the environment:

1.     Brief history & proposed designation plan

2.     Illustrations

3.     Key features & variations from the 2007 proposal

4.     New ponds

5.     New land treatment

6.     Discharges to the Ruamahanga River

7.     Ecology & Amenity

8.     Inflow & infiltration, natural hazards, and timing & costs

9.     Submissions & the hearing process

10.   Aerial photo showing distances of proposed scheme to neighbours

11.   Enlarged diagram of the proposed scheme

 

Newsletters

The following community newsletters also provide updates on the development progress of the proposed scheme:

Wastewater Upgrade 12th Newsletter February 2009 (PDF - 1.3Mb)

Wastewater Upgrade 11th Newsletter September 2008 (PDF - 309Kb)

Wastewater Upgrade 10th Newsletter May 2008 (PDF - 136Kb)

Wastewater Upgrade 9th Newsletter July 2007 (PDF - 195Kb)

Wastewater Upgrade 8th Newsletter February 2007 (PDF - 65Kb)

Wastewater Upgrade 7th Newsletter July 2006 (PDF - 94Kb)

Wastewater Upgrade 6th Newsletter February 2006 (PDF - 89Kb)

Wastewater Upgrade 4th Newsletter February 2005 (PDF - 235Kb)

Wastewater Upgrade 3rd Newsletter July 2004 (PDF - 226Kb)

Wastewater Upgrade 2nd Newsletter January 2004 (PDF - 226Kb)

Wastewater Upgrade 1st Newsletter July 2003 (PDF - 380Kb)